Ageing in Place: The Paradox of Planning

A goal without a plan is just a wish. – Antoine de Saint-Exupéry While scanning international studies on aging in place and planning effectiveness, a new whitepaper from Australia triggered a revealing phrase: the paradox of planning. While older people in Australia and Canada overwhelmingly have the goal of aging in place, few actually have the knowledge of what to do and how to start planning for the care, financial,….

Ageing in Place: The Paradox of Planning Continue Reading »

Smart Ageing

The Law of Substitution de residuo under the Civil Code of Québec: A Refresher from Recent Québec Superior Court Decisions

This blog has been written by Frédéric Barriault, Counsel, at Fasken LLP The decisions in De Forte c. Kassardjian, 2025 QCCS 91, and Succession de Tremblay c. Abran, 2025 QCCS 2626, offer a coherent and complementary articulation of Québec law governing substitutions de residuo, particularly regarding (1) their legal validity, and (2) the limits imposed by public order rules. Together, these judgments reaffirm the primacy of the testator’s intent while clarifying….

The Law of Substitution de residuo under the Civil Code of Québec: A Refresher from Recent Québec Superior Court Decisions Continue Reading »

Estate Administration, Estate Litigation, Estate Planning, Wills

Where Should You Commence Your Legal Proceeding? 

While litigants are generally entitled to choose at first instance where they commence a legal proceeding, litigants should make sure that the chosen venue has a rational connection to the matters at issue in the proceeding. Otherwise, there is a risk that the judge hearing the matter will transfer the proceeding to an alternative, more appropriate venue, as was the case in Gallant v Rowsell. In Gallant v Rowsell, the….

Where Should You Commence Your Legal Proceeding?  Continue Reading »

Uncategorized

Rogers v. Ferretti: Further Clarification on the Minimal Evidentiary Threshold

In a previous blog post, I discussed the importance of the minimal evidentiary threshold in will challenges. Notably, when document discovery is sought in a will challenge, the moving party must substantiate the release of a deceased person’s personal information, such as medical records and solicitors’ files. The minimal evidentiary threshold protects a deceased person’s privacy and deters disgruntled beneficiaries from commencing fishing expeditions into the deceased’s affairs simply because….

Rogers v. Ferretti: Further Clarification on the Minimal Evidentiary Threshold Continue Reading »

Uncategorized

The Caregiving Crisis at Work

A woman sits on a couch with her face in her hands, frustrated, sad, burned out.

Over the past decade, a caregiving crisis has been building in the workplace. Currently, 35% of the Canadian workforce or 8 million people, are struggling and juggling their work responsibilities with caregiving duties. It’s a perfect storm: a rapidly aging population living longer with more complex care needs and fewer family members to care for them. The stress of juggling caregiving and work responsibilities is leading to burnout, absenteeism, and….

The Caregiving Crisis at Work Continue Reading »

Elder Management, Smart Ageing

Finality Matters: Smith v. Bechtel in the Evolving Jurisprudence on Substantial Compliance

This blog was co-authored by Latoya Brown, Associate and Ciaran Sheahan, Student-at-Law at Fasken LLP Ontario courts have, in recent years, considered a growing number of cases addressing the scope of their curative jurisdiction under s. 21.1 of the Succession Law Reform Act (the “SLRA”), following the amendment empowering them to do so. These decisions continue to refine the doctrine of substantial compliance and to provide clarity on what constitutes….

Finality Matters: Smith v. Bechtel in the Evolving Jurisprudence on Substantial Compliance Continue Reading »

Charitable Giving, Contested wills, Estate Administration, Estate Litigation, Estate Planning, Succession Planning, Wills
Scroll to Top