The First Month After a Death: Practical First Steps for Executors and Family Members

This blog has been written by Caroline Caron, Paralegal, at Fasken LLP The weeks following a death can feel overwhelming. Alongside grief, there are practical responsibilities that often require prompt attention. Whether you are acting as executor or helping someone who is, a few clear first steps can make the process feel more manageable. Before turning to the specific initial steps involved in administering the estate, it is worth noting….

The First Month After a Death: Practical First Steps for Executors and Family Members Continue Reading »

Estate Administration, Executors

Medical Records and Will Challenges: Know the Limits

In will challenges, it is common for parties to seek disclosure of the testator’s medical records, particularly when there are allegations of undue influence or lack of testamentary capacity. While courts are often inclined to grant requests for medical records, the requests must be justifiable in relation to the litigation. This topic was addressed in the recent decision, Farooque v Korba, 2026 ONSC 3124 (CanLII), discussed below. Background The Deceased….

Medical Records and Will Challenges: Know the Limits Continue Reading »

Appeals, Contested wills, Estate Litigation, Undue influence

Ageing in Place: The Paradox of Planning

A goal without a plan is just a wish. – Antoine de Saint-Exupéry While scanning international studies on aging in place and planning effectiveness, a new whitepaper from Australia triggered a revealing phrase: the paradox of planning. While older people in Australia and Canada overwhelmingly have the goal of aging in place, few actually have the knowledge of what to do and how to start planning for the care, financial,….

Ageing in Place: The Paradox of Planning Continue Reading »

Smart Ageing

The Law of Substitution de residuo under the Civil Code of Québec: A Refresher from Recent Québec Superior Court Decisions

This blog has been written by Frédéric Barriault, Counsel, at Fasken LLP The decisions in De Forte c. Kassardjian, 2025 QCCS 91, and Succession de Tremblay c. Abran, 2025 QCCS 2626, offer a coherent and complementary articulation of Québec law governing substitutions de residuo, particularly regarding (1) their legal validity, and (2) the limits imposed by public order rules. Together, these judgments reaffirm the primacy of the testator’s intent while clarifying….

The Law of Substitution de residuo under the Civil Code of Québec: A Refresher from Recent Québec Superior Court Decisions Continue Reading »

Estate Administration, Estate Litigation, Estate Planning, Wills

Where Should You Commence Your Legal Proceeding? 

While litigants are generally entitled to choose at first instance where they commence a legal proceeding, litigants should make sure that the chosen venue has a rational connection to the matters at issue in the proceeding. Otherwise, there is a risk that the judge hearing the matter will transfer the proceeding to an alternative, more appropriate venue, as was the case in Gallant v Rowsell. In Gallant v Rowsell, the….

Where Should You Commence Your Legal Proceeding?  Continue Reading »

Uncategorized

Rogers v. Ferretti: Further Clarification on the Minimal Evidentiary Threshold

In a previous blog post, I discussed the importance of the minimal evidentiary threshold in will challenges. Notably, when document discovery is sought in a will challenge, the moving party must substantiate the release of a deceased person’s personal information, such as medical records and solicitors’ files. The minimal evidentiary threshold protects a deceased person’s privacy and deters disgruntled beneficiaries from commencing fishing expeditions into the deceased’s affairs simply because….

Rogers v. Ferretti: Further Clarification on the Minimal Evidentiary Threshold Continue Reading »

Uncategorized
Scroll to Top